Due to the fact there would not appear to be any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you provide a place to begin with this combination and points to think about when working this Load up?
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact copy of H4831. Bodily, it's a shorter grain size, for that reason, the designation SC or brief Slash. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to flow throughout the powder measures far more smoothly, helping to ease the consistent slicing of granules.
The most obvious result in is actually a tough/ruff bore. No number of copper fouling minimizing agents during the powder will probably appropriate this.
Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or standard) and ton that you are making use of nevertheless. Similar burn up level doesn't mean it's going to behave "accurately" the same. I've viewed over one hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp many H4831.
Beginner to reloading. This will probably be utilized for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been capable to get my hands on a few lbs of h4831.
Apache Jct Good details, I've jars of both equally and generally puzzled if they might be reloaded While using the very same recipes need to I run out of 1 or one other.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a minimal provide of Varget, along with a whole lot additional available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Virtually solely, mainly because that is definitely exactly what the rifles shoot the top.
The SC or SSC selected powders Commonly let for bigger load density, to help you commonly get a tad a lot more powder inside a given circumstance when employing compressed loads. Use of a fall tube can even more boost this advantage.
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Following months, I acquired Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the net not to mention compensated slightly excess. The very subsequent week at a gun present a guy had a whole situation of H1000 for $40 per 1lb. I neglect simply how much, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and h4831 vs h4831sc it’s a delicate load.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they've slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are superior. It bug the hell from me. I know greater. That is why I do not ever toss out my older manuals. I do order new guide all the time to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ levels with no problems.
This can be an older thread, you might not get a response, and will h4831 vs h4831sc be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to take into account creating a new thread.
It has been a little bit, but I did get some h4831sc load data 4831 SC to try. Discovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .six 5 shot team nowadays. It truly is somewhat slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Thanks for the advice, It is great to know that I have bought selections when just one or the opposite powder is dried up.
rayporter stated: i never found a variation apart from the regular is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Click to extend...
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t pleased with the velocity. Just after months, I received Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the web and of course paid out slightly added. The extremely future week in a gun display a man experienced an entire circumstance of H1000 for $forty for each 1lb. I overlook the amount of, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.